Super Archi vs Kalm (2026): Which Tool for Site Reports and Architecture Project Management?
Honest comparison of Super Archi and Kalm for architects managing site reports and project delivery. Features, pricing, and what each tool does best.
Reading time: 10 min — May 2026
Kalm and Super Archi both help architecture firms reduce project admin. But they approach the problem from very different angles.
Kalm focuses on all-in-one project management for architects and interior designers: written documents, consultation, site monitoring, and project coordination. Super Archi treats reports and follow-up as one module within a broader AI workspace that also handles project search, tender analysis, cost estimation, image generation, and project knowledge management.
The question is not which tool has more features. It is whether you need a classic project management tool for architects or an AI-native workspace that sits across the whole project workflow.
Table of Contents
- What Kalm does well
- Where Kalm falls short
- Do you need a project management tool or a workspace?
- How Super Archi approaches it differently
- Feature comparison
- Pricing comparison
- What Super Archi cannot do (yet)
- The call: specialization or integration?
What Kalm does well
Credit where it's due — Kalm has built a focused product for a real pain point.
All-in-one architecture project management
Kalm is clearly positioned as an all-in-one tool for architects and interior designers. On its public site, it groups written documents, consultation, site supervision, and project management in a single product rather than separating them across disconnected modules.
For smaller agencies, that simplicity is attractive.
Written documents and consultation workflow
Kalm does not stop at meeting follow-up. It also covers written documents, CCTP-style work descriptions, company consultation, quote import, quote comparison, and estimated budgets. This makes it closer to a true agency operations tool than a simple meeting-report app.
Mobile chantier workflow
This is one of Kalm's strongest points. Its site supervision module includes a mobile app, photo taking and annotations, task assignment to companies, and automatic PDF site reports. For teams spending time on site every week, that matters.
Public SaaS pricing
Kalm publishes clear pricing on its website. Its public plans include Support, Essential, and Premium tiers, each aimed at different levels of agency maturity. That makes evaluation much easier than tools that force you into a sales process first.
Where Kalm falls short
Less AI-native framing
Kalm does many architecture workflows well, but it is not primarily positioned as an AI-native workspace. Its value proposition is project organization and execution, not turning messy notes, documents, and project context into a searchable intelligence layer.
Weaker document intelligence layer
Kalm stores and structures project information, but it is not strongly positioned around natural-language search across all your project reports and documents, or around asking project questions and getting an answer with context back.
Less emphasis on meeting-to-action automation
Kalm supports site reports and tasks, but Super Archi leans much harder into the workflow of taking raw notes or transcripts and automatically producing decisions, action items, and searchable follow-up from them.
Missing adjacent AI workflows
Kalm covers a lot of agency execution, but it is not positioned around AI image generation, tender analysis as a dedicated AI workflow, or project-wide AI reasoning across mixed files and notes.
Do you need a project management tool or a workspace?
Most architecture firms do not just need site reports. A typical week includes:
- Running site and coordination meetings that need documented follow-up
- Tracking decisions and action items across several stakeholders
- Searching past project documents for constraints, references, and context
- Preparing consultations or tenders for new work
- Producing cost estimates for clients
- Generating visuals for presentations or competitions
A project management tool solves many of these well. But the question is whether you also need a stronger AI layer on top of them.
From conversations with dozens of architecture firms, the real problem is not "we need one more PM tool." It is "too much of our time goes to administrative tasks instead of design." Organization is part of that. Intelligent automation is another part.
How Super Archi approaches it differently
Super Archi is an AI workspace where reports are one module among several. The same platform handles:
Meeting reports — Feed in meeting notes, handwritten notes, or audio transcripts. Get structured minutes with decisions, action items with owners and deadlines, and open points flagged for follow-up. A 2-hour meeting produces a final report in about 5 minutes.
Follow-up extraction — Instead of just storing meeting content, Super Archi turns it into next steps. Who does what, by when, and what remains unresolved become explicit, searchable project follow-up.
Knowledge base — Centralize all project documents and search them with natural language. "Where did we mention the facade budget cap?" returns an answer with source context, not a folder to dig through.
Tender analysis — Upload a tender brief, and the AI extracts deadlines, constraints, requirements, and evaluation criteria before you invest hours in a response.
Cost estimation — Input project specs and get a first estimate calibrated to current market rates and your firm's past project data.
Image generation — Sketch-to-render, 3D-to-render, plan-to-perspective, and style variations, saved directly to the project workspace.
Everything is connected within project workspaces. A meeting decision links to the project it belongs to. A report can feed into future search. A tender analysis can sit next to the same project memory. This is not just project management — it is an AI layer across the project.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Super Archi | Kalm |
|---|---|---|
| Site / field report generation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile chantier workflow | ❌ | ✅ |
| Photo annotations | ❌ | ✅ |
| Action-item extraction | ✅ | ✅ |
| Search across reports/documents | ✅ | ❌ |
| Project knowledge base / search | ✅ | ❌ |
| Tender / RFP analysis | ✅ | ❌ |
| Building cost estimation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Technical specifications (CCTP) | ✅ | ✅ |
| AI image generation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Team collaboration workspace | ✅ | ✅ |
| Transparent public pricing | ✅ | ✅ |
Pricing comparison
| Super Archi | Kalm | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Public SaaS tiers on website | Public SaaS tiers on website |
| Free entry point | Yes — free trial | Yes — try for free |
| Entry point | See superarchi.co/pricing | Support from €39/month per agency; Essential from €49/month up to 1 user; Premium from €79/month up to 5 users |
| What pricing is built around | AI project workflow modules | Architecture project management features |
| Billing style | Monthly or yearly | Public plan pricing shown on official site |
Based on Kalm's public website on May 26, 2026, the product is transparent on pricing and clearly positioned for agencies. The bigger difference is product philosophy: Kalm is an all-in-one architecture PM tool, while Super Archi is a broader AI workspace with stronger emphasis on follow-up extraction, search, and adjacent automation.
What Super Archi cannot do (yet)
Honesty matters. Here is where Kalm currently has an edge:
- Dedicated mobile chantier workflow — Kalm explicitly offers a mobile site supervision app with on-site reporting, which is stronger than Super Archi's current positioning.
- Photo taking and annotation in site supervision — Kalm's chantier workflow includes photo capture and annotations as part of the core supervision product.
- Classic architecture PM depth — Kalm covers written documents, consultation, site monitoring, Todo, planning, and project execution in a very direct agency-oriented package.
These are genuine advantages for firms whose primary pain point is day-to-day project execution rather than project intelligence and AI automation.
The call: specialization or integration?
Choose Kalm if:
- You want a straightforward all-in-one project management tool for architects and interior designers
- Mobile chantier follow-up is central to your workflow
- Written documents, consultation, site monitoring, and PM structure are your main bottlenecks
- You prefer a classic execution-focused tool over a broader AI workspace
- You want public agency pricing and a clear SaaS offer
Choose Super Archi if:
- You want one AI workspace that covers reports, follow-up, document search, tenders, cost estimation, image generation, and project knowledge
- You need a stronger meeting-to-action pipeline than a classic PM tool usually offers
- Searchable project memory matters as much as project organization
- You are tired of juggling multiple tools and want your project data connected in one place
- Transparent pricing and a free trial matter to your decision process
Consider both if:
You have a team where some members need strong day-to-day PM execution and site supervision workflows (Kalm), while others need broader AI search, follow-up, and project intelligence (Super Archi). But most firms under 30 people will benefit more from the tool that best addresses their main bottleneck: execution structure or AI automation.
Ready to see how Super Archi handles your next report or follow-up? Start the free trial — upload your notes, extract the actions, and keep the whole project searchable in one workspace. No sales call required. Try Super Archi free →
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kalm better than Super Archi for site reports?
How much does Kalm cost compared to Super Archi?
Can Super Archi replace Kalm?
Which tool is better for small architecture firms?
Can I use both Super Archi and Kalm together?
Stop re-explaining your project to AI every time.
SuperArchi centralises your project data and automates repetitive tasks — meeting reports, tenders, knowledge base. The AI already knows your practice.
Set up in 3 minutes
- •No credit card required
- •Cancel anytime
- •Data export guaranteed