Super Archi vs Archireport (2026): Which Tool for Site Reports and Project Follow-Up?

Reading time: 10 min — May 2026

Archireport and Super Archi both help architecture firms spend less time on project admin. But they approach the problem from very different angles.

Archireport focuses on site supervision: remarks, annotations, chantier follow-up, and PDF site reports. Super Archi treats reports as one module within a broader AI workspace that also handles meeting follow-up, cost estimation, image generation, tender workflows, and project knowledge management.

The question is not which tool has more features. It is whether you need a specialized field-reporting tool or a platform that covers your full project workflow.

Table of Contents

1. What Archireport does well
2. Where Archireport falls short
3. Do you need a field-reporting tool or a workspace?
4. How Super Archi approaches it differently
5. Feature comparison
6. Pricing comparison
7. What Super Archi cannot do (yet)
8. The call: specialization or integration?

What Archireport does well

Credit where it's due — Archireport has built a focused product for a real pain point.

Site inspection reporting speed

Archireport is designed around one very concrete promise: leave the meeting with the report practically done. On its public product pages, it positions PDF report generation as something you do as soon as the site meeting is over, rather than back at the office later.

For firms running several site visits per week, this alone can save hours.

Remarks and snags directly on plans and photos

This is where Archireport is most specialized. You can place remarks on plans, annotate photos, sketch directly on documents, and organize site observations by work package or contractor. That is not generic note-taking — it is chantier-native reporting.

Sharing and recipient-specific reports

Archireport also goes beyond just exporting one PDF. It lets teams configure report content for different recipients, filter remarks by work package or company, and send reports directly from the app. For site coordination, that matters.

Project structure for supervision work

Projects can be organized into work packages, participants, schedules, remarks, and report templates. Teams that live inside construction administration workflows will recognize the logic immediately.

Where Archireport falls short

Site-supervision-only focus

Archireport does one thing well — but architecture work does not stop at producing a chantier report. You still have meetings to summarize, client decisions to track, documents to search, costs to estimate, tenders to analyze, visuals to produce, and a broader project memory to maintain.

This means you may still need additional tools for every other part of your workflow. More tools means more subscriptions, more logins, and more data scattered across platforms.

Not an AI-native workspace

Archireport is a digital reporting tool, not an AI-first workspace. It helps structure site supervision well, but it is not positioned around extracting decisions from messy notes, turning transcripts into action lists, or letting you ask questions across your project documents in natural language.

No broader project memory layer

Once a report has been produced and sent, the next problem is often retrieval: what was decided, who committed to what, what changed since the previous meeting, where that issue was first mentioned. Archireport stores and structures project information, but it does not position itself as a searchable project memory layer across reports, notes, and documents.

No adjacent architecture workflows

Archireport is not built for tender analysis, cost estimation, technical specification drafting, or AI image generation. If your agency wants one platform that reduces admin time across the whole lifecycle of a project, not just chantier reporting, you will need other tools next to it.

Do you need a field-reporting tool or a workspace?

Most architecture firms do not just produce site reports. A typical week includes:

• Running site and coordination meetings that need documented follow-up
• Tracking decisions and action items across several stakeholders
• Searching past project documents for context, constraints, and precedent
• Producing cost estimates for client conversations or early feasibility
• Preparing tender responses or screening new opportunities
• Generating architectural visuals for presentations or competitions

A field-reporting tool solves one of these well. The rest still consumes your non-billable hours.

From conversations with dozens of architecture firms, the real problem is not "writing the site report is slow." It is "too much of our time goes to administrative tasks instead of design." Site reports are part of that — but only part.

How Super Archi approaches it differently

Super Archi is an AI workspace where reports are one module among several. The same platform handles:

Meeting reports — Feed in meeting notes, handwritten notes, or audio transcripts. Get structured minutes with decisions, action items with owners and deadlines, and open points flagged for follow-up. A 2-hour meeting produces a final report in about 5 minutes.

Follow-up extraction — Instead of just storing notes, Super Archi turns them into next steps. Who does what, by when, and what remains unresolved become explicit, searchable objects rather than paragraphs buried in a PDF.

Knowledge base — Centralize all project documents and search them with natural language. "What facade constraint did the client mention last month?" returns the answer with source context, not a folder to dig through.

Tender analysis — Upload a tender brief, and the AI extracts deadlines, constraints, requirements, and evaluation criteria. It helps you decide whether a tender is worth pursuing before you invest hours in a response.

Cost estimation — Input project specs and get a first estimate calibrated to current market rates and your firm's past project data, not generic benchmarks.

Image generation — Sketch-to-render, 3D-to-render, plan-to-perspective, and style variations. Architecture-specific vocabulary, saved directly to the project workspace.

Everything is connected within project workspaces. A meeting decision links to the project it belongs to. An action item sits next to the report that created it. A cost estimate references the brief it was based on. This is not six separate AI tools — it is one workspace.

Feature comparison

Pricing comparison

Based on Archireport's public pricing page on May 26, 2026, the product is transparent on pricing — unlike many vertical tools in AEC. The difference is elsewhere: Archireport's pricing is for a focused site-supervision workflow, while Super Archi's pricing is for a broader AI workspace where reports sit alongside follow-up, search, tenders, cost estimation, and visuals.

What Super Archi cannot do (yet)

Honesty matters. Here is where Archireport currently has an edge:

• Plan- and photo-based remarking — Archireport is built around placing markers on plans, annotating images, and making chantier observations visually explicit. Super Archi does not yet offer that same field-native annotation workflow.
• Recipient-specific chantier report configuration — Archireport lets teams filter report contents by recipient, work package, or company before sending. Super Archi generates and exports structured reports, but it is not yet as advanced on chantier-specific distribution logic.
• Dedicated site-supervision interface — Archireport's whole interface is organized around remarks, work packages, participants, and report production. Super Archi's collaboration is project-wide, not centered entirely on chantier reporting.

These are genuine advantages for firms whose primary pain point is site supervision execution.

The call: specialization or integration?

Choose Archireport if:

• Site inspection reporting is your only bottleneck — everything else works fine
• You need marker-based remarks on plans and photos as a core part of your workflow
• Recipient-filtered PDF chantier reports are central to how your team operates
• You prefer a purpose-built interface for site supervision over a broader AI workspace
• You want public pricing and a 30-day free trial for this exact use case

Choose Super Archi if:

• You want one AI workspace that covers reports, follow-up, document search, tenders, cost estimation, image generation, and project knowledge
• You need decisions and action items extracted automatically — not just documented manually
• Searchable project memory matters as much as producing the report itself
• You are tired of juggling multiple tools and want your project data connected in one place
• Transparent pricing and a free trial matter to your decision process

Consider both if:

You have a large team where some members focus on site supervision and field reporting (Archireport) while others need broader project intelligence and AI workflows (Super Archi). But most firms under 30 people will find one integrated platform simpler to manage if their main problem is not annotations on site, but the accumulation of admin across the whole project lifecycle.

Ready to see how Super Archi handles your next meeting or site follow-up? Start the free trial — upload your notes, extract the actions, and keep the whole project searchable in one workspace. No sales call required. Try Super Archi free →