Super Archi vs ATTIC+ (2026): Which Tool for Written Documents, Bidding, and Site Workflow?

Honest comparison of Super Archi and ATTIC+ for architects handling written documents, bidding, and site workflow. Features, pricing, and what each tool does best.

Sébastien Lucas
comparisoncctpbiddingattic+

Reading time: 10 min — May 2026

ATTIC+ and Super Archi both help architecture and construction teams reduce project admin. But they approach the problem from very different angles.

ATTIC+ focuses on written documents, quantities, bidding, BIM-adjacent workflows, and chantier follow-up through a mature building-software suite. Super Archi treats reports, follow-up, and project search as one module within a broader AI workspace that also handles tender analysis, cost estimation, image generation, and project knowledge management.

The question is not which tool has more features. It is whether you need a deep building-software suite for CCTP, quantities, bidding, and chantier follow-up or an AI workspace for project intelligence and administrative acceleration.

Table of Contents

  1. What ATTIC+ does well
  2. Where ATTIC+ falls short
  3. Do you need a building-software suite or a workspace?
  4. How Super Archi approaches it differently
  5. Feature comparison
  6. Pricing comparison
  7. What Super Archi cannot do (yet)
  8. The call: specialization or integration?

What ATTIC+ does well

Credit where it's due — ATTIC+ has built a focused product line for a real industry need.

Strong written-documents stack

ATTIC+ is not a lightweight note-taking tool. Its public positioning is built around managing the "pièces écrites" of building projects: descriptions, quantities, estimates, bidding, and chantier management. For firms that live in CCTP, quantification, and consultation workflows, that matters.

Bidding and chantier modules

The suite explicitly includes modules such as WinOFFRE for offer analysis and WinCHANT for chantier financial follow-up. That gives ATTIC+ depth on the administrative and financial side of building execution, not just on document production.

BIM- and Revit-adjacent positioning

ATTIC+ also leans heavily into 3D, IFC, and Revit-adjacent workflows. Its public materials highlight Graphic-Pack, IFC import/export, a Revit plug-in, and BimCHANT for graphical chantier follow-up based on study models. This is a very different product philosophy from an AI-first workspace.

Public perpetual-license pricing

ATTIC+ publishes prices publicly, including perpetual-license pricing and optional maintenance. For firms that prefer software they buy rather than subscribe to, this is a meaningful difference.

Where ATTIC+ falls short

Not an AI-native workspace

ATTIC+ does many building workflows well, but it is not primarily positioned as an AI-native workspace. Its value proposition is document and chantier software depth, not turning messy notes, uploaded files, and mixed project context into a searchable intelligence layer.

Not centered on meeting-report automation

ATTIC+ is not presented as a tool for taking handwritten notes, transcripts, or raw meeting content and transforming them into structured reports, decisions, action items, and follow-up in minutes.

No comparable project-memory layer

Once a project grows, retrieval becomes as important as production: where did we decide this, what changed, what did the client ask for, what was already said in earlier reports. ATTIC+ stores project outputs, but it is not positioned as a natural-language project memory across mixed sources.

Missing adjacent AI workflows

ATTIC+ is not positioned around AI image generation, AI reasoning across project files, or AI-first follow-up extraction from meetings and site conversations. If you want a stronger AI layer across mixed project data, you will still need another tool.

Do you need a building-software suite or a workspace?

Most architecture firms do not just need written documents. A typical week includes:

  • Writing or updating technical and commercial project documentation
  • Following chantier progress and coordinating stakeholders
  • Tracking decisions and action items from meetings
  • Searching past project documents for constraints and context
  • Preparing tenders or consultations
  • Producing estimates and visuals for clients

A building-software suite solves some of these very well. The question is whether you also need a stronger AI layer across them.

From conversations with dozens of architecture firms, the real problem is not only "we need better CCTP software." It is "too much of our time goes to administrative tasks instead of design." Document production is part of that. Intelligent follow-up and retrieval are another part.

How Super Archi approaches it differently

Super Archi is an AI workspace where reports, search, and follow-up are one module among several. The same platform handles:

Meeting reports — Feed in meeting notes, handwritten notes, or audio transcripts. Get structured minutes with decisions, action items with owners and deadlines, and open points flagged for follow-up. A 2-hour meeting produces a final report in about 5 minutes.

Follow-up extraction — Instead of just storing documents, Super Archi turns notes and conversations into next steps. Who does what, by when, and what remains unresolved become explicit, searchable project follow-up.

Knowledge base — Centralize all project documents and search them with natural language. "Where did we mention the client budget constraint?" returns an answer with source context.

Tender analysis — Upload a tender brief, and the AI extracts deadlines, constraints, requirements, and evaluation criteria before you invest hours in a response.

Cost estimation — Input project specs and get a first estimate calibrated to current market rates and your firm's past project data.

Image generation — Sketch-to-render, 3D-to-render, plan-to-perspective, and style variations, saved directly to the project workspace.

Everything is connected within project workspaces. A meeting decision links to the project it belongs to. A report feeds future search. A tender analysis can sit next to other project context. This is not only production software — it is an AI workspace across the project lifecycle.

Feature comparison

FeatureSuper ArchiATTIC+
CCTP / written documents✅✅
Quantities / costing workflow✅✅
Tender / bidding workflow✅✅
Site / chantier follow-up✅✅
Meeting-report generation from notes/transcripts✅❌
Action-item extraction✅❌
Search across past project docs✅❌
Project knowledge base / search✅❌
AI image generation✅❌
Team collaboration workspace✅✅
Transparent public pricing✅✅
SaaS AI workspace model✅❌

Pricing comparison

Super ArchiATTIC+
Pricing modelPublic SaaS tiers on websitePublic perpetual-license pricing
Free entry pointYes — free trialNo free trial; free presentation/demo offered publicly
Entry pointSee superarchi.co/pricingClassic-Pack from €2,400 HT; Graphic-Pack from €4,000-€5,600 HT depending on configuration
Additional modulesIncluded by plan/usage modelWinOFFRE from €500 HT; WinCHANT from €700 HT as add-on or €900 HT standalone
Maintenance modelSaaS subscription6 months included, then optional annual maintenance at 15% of license price

Based on ATTIC+'s public pricing pages on May 26, 2026, the product is transparent about its perpetual-license model and optional maintenance. The difference is structural: ATTIC+ is sold like a mature building-software suite, while Super Archi is sold like a SaaS AI workspace.

What Super Archi cannot do (yet)

Honesty matters. Here is where ATTIC+ currently has an edge:

  • Depth on written building documents — ATTIC+ is explicitly built for CCTP, quantities, estimates, bidding, and chantier financial follow-up as core product lines.
  • BIM- and Revit-adjacent workflow depth — ATTIC+ offers IFC, Revit plug-in, and graphical chantier workflow capabilities that are much more specific than Super Archi's current positioning.
  • Perpetual-license software model — Some firms simply prefer software they buy once and maintain, rather than a SaaS AI subscription model. ATTIC+ serves that preference directly.

These are genuine advantages for firms whose primary pain point is deep production software for building documentation and chantier administration.

The call: specialization or integration?

Choose ATTIC+ if:

  • Written documents, quantities, bidding, and chantier follow-up are your main bottlenecks
  • You want mature building-software depth rather than a broader AI workspace
  • BIM, IFC, Revit-adjacent workflows, and graphical chantier tools matter to your process
  • You prefer a perpetual-license software model
  • Your team is already organized around formal production software for building documentation

Choose Super Archi if:

  • You want one AI workspace that covers reports, follow-up, document search, tenders, cost estimation, image generation, and project knowledge
  • You need fast meeting-report generation from raw notes or transcripts
  • Searchable project memory matters as much as document production
  • You are tired of juggling multiple tools and want your project data connected in one place
  • Transparent pricing and a free trial matter to your decision process

Consider both if:

You have a team where some members depend on deep written-document and bidding software (ATTIC+) while others need broader AI follow-up, search, and project intelligence (Super Archi). But most firms will benefit more from the platform that addresses their real bottleneck: production depth or AI automation.


Ready to see how Super Archi handles your next report, search, or follow-up? Start the free trial — upload your notes or project documents, extract the actions, and keep the whole project searchable in one workspace. No sales call required. Try Super Archi free →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ATTIC+ better than Super Archi for written documents and bidding?
ATTIC+ is stronger if your team needs a mature building-software suite for CCTP, quantities, bidding, BIM-adjacent workflows, and chantier follow-up. Super Archi is stronger if you want an AI-native workspace for meeting reports, project search, follow-up extraction, and broader automation.
How much does ATTIC+ cost compared to Super Archi?
ATTIC+ publishes public pricing for perpetual licenses and optional maintenance on its official pricing pages as of May 26, 2026. Super Archi also offers transparent pricing on its website, but as a SaaS AI workspace rather than a perpetual-license software suite.
Can Super Archi replace ATTIC+?
For AI-generated reports, decisions, action tracking, project search, tender analysis, and adjacent AI workflows, yes in many cases. But firms that depend on deep written-doc workflows, quantified building documents, and ATTIC+'s bidding and chantier modules may still prefer ATTIC+.
Which tool is better for small architecture firms?
Small firms that need strong CCTP, costing, and bidding structure may find ATTIC+ compelling. Firms that want more AI automation across reports, search, and mixed project data will usually get more value from Super Archi.
Can I use both Super Archi and ATTIC+ together?
There is no technical integration between the two, but nothing prevents using both. That said, running one suite for written documents and another workspace for AI follow-up adds cost and workflow friction. Most firms will benefit from choosing the platform that matches their main bottleneck.
SuperArchi Logo
SuperArchi
• FREE TRIAL • 14 DAYS •

Stop re-explaining your project to AI every time.

SuperArchi centralises your project data and automates repetitive tasks — meeting reports, tenders, knowledge base. The AI already knows your practice.

Create my account

Set up in 3 minutes

  • •No credit card required
  • •Cancel anytime
  • •Data export guaranteed